Feeding whole milk is the alternative to feeding milk replacer to pre-weaned calves, but substantial challenges related to nutrient consistency, pathogen exposure, and feeding logistics prevent its adoption on many dairies. Calves often appear to grow better when fed whole milk as compared to milk replacer and this is probably due to the greater fat (31%) and protein (25%) content of whole milk relative to commonly fed milk replacers (Table 1). However, milk replacer-fed calves can perform just as well as calves fed whole milk as long as they consume a sufficient amount of energy and protein by increasing milk replacer quantity, nutrient content, or both.
TABLE 1. DAIRY CALF MILK AND MILK REPLACER FEEDING PRACTICES BY HERD SIZE. |
|
% of Operations by Herd Sze |
|
Very Small
(<30) |
Small
(30 to 99) |
Medium
(100 to 499) |
Large
(>500) |
All Herds |
FREQUENCY OF FEEDING |
2 times per day |
92 |
97 |
94 |
84 |
95 |
3 times per day |
3 |
2 |
3 |
9 |
3 |
AMOUNT FED DAILY |
4 to 5 quarts |
56 |
55 |
54 |
35 |
53 |
6 to 7 quarts |
17 |
22 |
21 |
25 |
21 |
more than 7 quarts |
22 |
21 |
22 |
37 |
22 |
MILK REPLACER PROTEIN % |
20% |
47 |
61 |
59 |
52 |
59 |
21 TO 24% |
26 |
31 |
32 |
26 |
31 |
Over 24% |
18 |
9 |
9 |
23 |
10 |
MILK REPLACER FAT CONTENT |
20% |
72 |
82 |
87 |
65 |
82 |
21 to 24% |
10 |
10 |
7 |
16 |
10 |
Over 24% |
19 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Data adapted from the 2014 Dairy Cattle Management Practices in the United States published by USDA APHIS NAHMS (https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/dairy/downloads/dairy14/Dairy14_dr_PartI_1.pdf |
(Re) Defining Your Goals
When asking yourself whether or not your calves are getting “enough” nutrition from milk replacer, you first need to ask yourself (and be honest) whether your calves and first lactation cows are performing the way you think they should be. If the answer is no, then you should look at several aspects of the heifer program to determine where improvements can be made. Measurements such as birthweight, weaning weight, morbidity and mortality rates, age and weight at breeding, and age and weight at first calving are critical pieces of information for this assessment. For the pre-weaned calf program, weaning weight is an invaluable measurement that can be helpful to pinpoint potential shortcomings of the milk feeding program. The Dairy Calf and Heifer Association recommends that calves double their birth weight by weaning. With this in mind, a 90-pound calf would need to gain roughly 1.6 pounds per day in order to double her birth weight by 56 days (8 weeks). Typical target growth rates for pre-weaned calves range from 1.2 to 1.8 pounds per day, through rates greater than 2 pounds per day are generally not advised due to potential long-term negative effects on milk production.
Determine How Much to Feed
The amount of milk replacer that should be fed is a function of the calf’s body weight, target growth rate, and the fat and protein content of the replacer itself. The dairy cattle NRC (2001) has a set of equations that can be used to estimate a calf’s daily energy and protein requirement.
Based on these estimated requirements, feeding 5 quarts of a 20:20 milk replacer (at 12.5% solids) is simply insufficient to achieve a growth rate that would enable the average calf to double her birth weight by 8 weeks of age (see Table 2 below). As shown in Table 2, this feeding rate provides the calf with only about 65% of the energy and 48% of the protein she needs. Feeding at this rate will likely limit growth to about 0.7 pounds per day, especially before measurable amounts of starter grain are consumed. Even feeding a 22:20 milk replacer at 5 quarts per day is insufficient, and growth will still be limited to about 0.8 pounds per day.
TABLE 2. DAILY MILK REPLACER FEEDING EXAMPLE 1: A 90-LB CALF WITH AN ADG OF 1.6 LB/D FED A 20:20 MILK REPLACER¹ |
Powder
(lb)² |
Water
(Quarts) |
Amount Fed
(Quarts) |
Energy
(% or Req.) |
Protein
(% of Req.) |
1.0 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
52 |
39 |
1.6 |
5.25 |
6.0 |
78 |
58 |
2.1 |
7.0 |
8.0 |
104 |
76 |
2.6 |
8.75 |
10.0 |
130 |
95 |
¹Calculations are based on equations from the 2001 Dairy NRC. It is assumed that the milk replacer contains milk-based proteins and has a lactose content of 45% (DM-basis).
²Powder: water ratio presented ensures a mixed solids content of 12.5% |
So, what can be done to increase pre-weaning gain? There are three options: increase the nutrient density of the milk replacer, increase the amount of milk replacer fed, or a combination of both. Table 3 shows an example of the same 90-lb calf fed a 27:20 milk replacer.
TABLE 3. DAILY MILK REPLACER FEEDING EXAMPLE 1: A 90-LB CALF WITH AN ADG OF 1.6 LB/D FED A 27:20 MILK REPLACER¹ |
Powder
(lb)² |
Water
(Quarts) |
Amount Fed
(Quarts) |
Energy
(% or Req.) |
Protein
(% of Req.) |
1.0 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
56 |
52 |
1.6 |
5.25 |
6.0 |
85 |
78 |
2.1 |
7.0 |
8.0 |
113 |
103 |
2.6 |
8.75 |
10.0 |
141 |
128 |
¹Calculations are based on equations from the 2001 Dairy NRC. It is assumed that the milk replacer contains milk-based proteins and has a lactose content of 45% (DM-basis).
²Powder: water ratio presented ensures a mixed solids content of 12.5% |
Obviously, increasing the feeding rate or nutrient density of a milk replacer is a significant economic investment, so it is important to weigh the cost vs. potential return. Benefits from increasing the amount of nutrition consumed from milk replacer could include: an earlier age at weaning (fewer days on milk = saved labor and milk replacer); reduced calf-hood illness (fewer treatments = saved labor and treatment costs); or an increase in first lactation milk production (increased revenue from higher sustained levels of production).
Although it may seem daunting to purchase a 27:20 milk replacer compared with a 20:20 replacer, also consider that in the example above, the same calf would need to consume more than half a pound less milk replacer powder per day with the 27:20 replacer to achieve results similar those possible with a 20:20 replacer.
Ensure Accurate Measurements
The ideal solids content of reconstituted milk replacer is around 12.5%. Feeding milk replacer with a solids content greater than 13.5% can be problematic for calves and increases risk for scours and poor digestion. The only way to ensure a consistent and accurate milk meal at every feeding is to measure the amount of water and milk replacer powder. This means using a scale to weigh the powder and a volumetric (liquid) measuring device to measure the amount of water. The plastic cups that comes in the bag of milk replacer is generally NOT a consistently accurate means of measuring the amount of powder at each feeding. Remember, calves (and cows) thrive on consistency.
Take Home
The historical mindset was to feed as little milk replacer or milk as possible in order to encourage solid feed intake. However, this approach can significantly impair pre-weaning growth and causes producers to miss out on capturing the benefits of the inherently high feed efficiency of calves during this period.
Although ensuring adequate intake of high quality colostrum during the first few hours of life is arguably the most critical step in the calf program, nutrition before weaning can also have significant long-term effects on performance. Therefore, avoid overlooking this important aspect of the your replacement program.